[回到版面]
回應模式
名 稱
內 文
附加圖檔[] []
  • 可附加圖檔類型:GIF, JPG, JPEG, PNG, WEBM,瀏覽器才能正常附加圖檔
  • 附加圖檔最大上傳資料量為 5120 KB。
  • 當檔案超過寬 125 像素、高 125 像素時會自動縮小尺寸顯示
  • 投稿時請點擊畫像認證後,再按下 [送出] 按鈕提交。
  • 鬧板、攻擊性發言、煽動性發言請無視(回應者也無視),並使用del或在貓管理部向管理員回報。
  • 新介面尚處於測試階段,如果有任何問題可以向管理員或於程設交流版反映。

直射火力當曲射火力無名23/06/04(日)13:57:06 ID:aiBIBjHUNo.1187924del
目前前往烏克蘭的俄軍t55似乎都是作為步兵曲射支援火力,是當砲兵用

不過戰車砲這種產品適合這樣子幹嗎?
無名23/06/04(日)14:09:25 ID:wJKhfq4wNo.1187931del
>>1187924
韓戰紅茶佬也幹過一樣的事啊
WW2老德虎一還當過SPAAG咧(都市傳說
無名23/06/04(日)14:25:28 ID:QPa1pp/QNo.1187935del
>>1187924
T-55上面的D-10在二戰中就是幹火力支援的工作
算是復古了
無名23/06/04(日)14:32:31 ID:I.602.CMNo.1187940del
>>1187935
記得T55的仰角在俄老戰車裡算是高的了
無名23/06/04(日)15:14:16 ID:LJOsBFgcNo.1187949del
炮本身應該都沒問題
仰角土炮一點就堆的出來
主要還是計算吧
無名23/06/04(日)19:50:18 ID:Sf4hs4pANo.1188003del
>>1187924
線膛炮準度可能還可以吧
還有就是上面有人說的韓戰範例
美軍自家也有用M26的例子 不過他們有挖土堆
無名23/06/04(日)20:59:46 ID:hShyyX62No.1188015del
>>1188003
圖片這台應該是M46了
無名23/06/04(日)22:13:09 ID:tM59rYg2No.1188023del
>>1187935

https://www.forbes.com/sites/davidaxe/2023/03/24/russias-ancient-t-55-tanks-could-double-as-artillery-but-not-very-good-artillery/?sh=171d4683472e

Russia’s Ancient T-55 Tanks Could Double As Artillery.
But Not Very Good Artillery.

2023/03/24

There’s ample precedent for tanks-as-artillery in the Ukraine war and other conflicts. The Ukrainian army has compensated for a dearth of howitzers by drilling indirect-fire techniques into the three-person crews of its locally-made T-64 tanks. The Russian army lately has done the same - even with its best T-90s.

The low elevation obviously limits the D-10T’s range while firing indirectly at targets beyond visual range. Another limitation is that a D-10T’s ammunition, like all modern tank ammo, is “fixed.” That is, it includes the warhead and charge in a single pre-made unit. In contrast to an artillery crew, a tank crew can’t add powder bags to the charge to boost its firing range.
無名23/06/04(日)22:20:56 ID:XD4nVe92No.1188027del
>>1188015
尾椎有四排隔柵板
你應該是對的 M26尾椎只有兩排

是說M26升級到M46時 變速箱從縱置改為橫置
可是尾椎長度似乎沒有縮短?....
無名23/06/04(日)22:23:00 ID:tM59rYg2No.1188029del
>>1187931

https://www.spslandforces.com/story/?id=354

Employment of Tanks in Indirect Firing Role

In indirect fire weapons, the gunners do not see the target and use an artificial aiming reference to engage and carry out corrections

Issue 02 - 2015

The idea of providing indirect fire support by tanks is not a new one.
In November, 1937, three Japanese tanks formed a stationary battery while infantry were crossing the Suchow Canal.
In February, 1938, 40 tanks were similarly employed at the crossing of the River Hwai.
The longest ranges at which tanks have been recorded to have provided fire support is 11 km in 1966 by Israeli M51 Sherman and Centurion tanks with other tank crews on foot providing corrections.
The tank is a versatile weapon platform and it is only in the order of things that we utilise its great potential in all fields so as to enable us to win the next war.
無名23/06/04(日)23:54:24 ID:fKMrjiToNo.1188051del
>>1187935
問題D10裝的是驅逐戰車 人家火力支援是坦克用的
無名23/06/05(一)00:49:35 ID:zjriftsINo.1188058del
打烏軍砲灰動員兵就很夠用了
無名23/06/05(一)11:31:18 ID:2xIGyck.No.1188118del
>>1188027
我以為最明顯的是連到擋泥板上的排氣管
尾椎沒縮短可以多放油箱阿
記得那時汽油引擎沒柴油跑得遠
而且戰爭期間做這種構改應該會影響生產速度
無名23/06/05(一)18:25:30 ID:wBffzW0YNo.1188183del
D-10 Riskadh級重巡曾經很勁.

https://memory-beta.fandom.com/wiki/Riskadh_class

D-10 Riskadh Class heavy cruiser

Klingon Imperial Fleet

Klingon Empire


【刪除文章】[]
刪除用密碼: