[回到版面]
回應模式
名 稱
內 文
附加圖檔[] []
  • 可附加圖檔類型:GIF, JPG, JPEG, PNG, WEBM,瀏覽器才能正常附加圖檔
  • 附加圖檔最大上傳資料量為 5120 KB。
  • 當檔案超過寬 125 像素、高 125 像素時會自動縮小尺寸顯示
  • 投稿時請點擊畫像認證後,再按下 [送出] 按鈕提交。
  • 鬧板、攻擊性發言、煽動性發言請無視(回應者也無視),並使用del或在貓管理部向管理員回報。
  • 新介面尚處於測試階段,如果有任何問題可以向管理員或於程設交流版反映。

關於視距內狗鬥無名24/02/12(一)19:04:29 ID:qxtHYfCINo.1209879del
https://youtu.be/dcum_ZLQehA?si=CCqbtGTGXsjphVMH

俄國的思維從機體靈活度來開發,美國的思維是從頭盔功能開發
無名24/02/12(一)19:29:38 ID:vSd05kjQNo.1209880del
支点 : . . .

https://issuu.com/hennieheymans/docs/nongqai_vol_12_no_8/s/12986141

HOW THE FORMER SOVIET UNION AC QUIRED THE "HELMET MOUNTED SIGHT" FOR THEIR AIR FORCE: Wolfgang Witschas

After the South African system had been proven in combat, playing a role in downing Soviet fighter aircraft (MiG-21s and -23s) over Angola, the Soviets embarked on a "crash programme” to counter the technology.
As a result, the MiG-29 was fielded in 1985 with an HMD and a high off-boresight weapon (R-73), giving them an advantage in close in maneuvering engagements.
無名24/02/12(一)20:16:21 ID:Yu6BWte.No.1209883del
相反吧 mig29是最早用頭盔瞄準的
美國運用能量空戰理論作出f-16
之後還有afti x-31 可動噴嘴
在匿蹤成為主流之前
美國在飛行機動研究不少
無名24/02/13(二)00:16:10 ID:TSMseiUANo.1209889del
>>1209879
並沒有,那都是90年代後來的事情了
無名24/02/13(二)18:11:05 ID:Z3By21MINo.1209911del
在匿蹤成為主流之前,MiG-29可以关闭雷达,打开IRST。
無名24/02/14(三)01:29:46 ID:W4t.EQyYNo.1209929del
>>1209883

https://www.16va.be/mig-29_experience.htm

Luftwaffe MiG-29 experience

But when all that is said and done, the MiG-29 is a superb fighter for close-in combat, even compared with aircraft like the F-15, F-16 and F/A-18.
This is due to the aircraft's superb aerodynamics and helmet mounted sight.
Inside ten nautical miles I'm hard to defeat, and with the IRST, helmet sight and (I!%(BArcher' I can't be beaten.
Period.
Even against the latest Block 50 F-16s the MiG-29 is virtually invulnerable in the close-in scenario.
On one occasion I remember the F-16s did score some kills eventually, but only after taking 18 (I!%(BArchers'.
We didn't operate kill removal (forcing (I!%(Bkilled' aircraft to leave the fight) since they'd have got no training value, we killed them too quickly.
(Just as we might seldom have got close-in if they used their AMRAAMs BVR!)
They couldn't believe it at the debrief, they got up and left the room!


【刪除文章】[]
刪除用密碼: