[
回首頁
] [
搜尋
] [
檔案區
] [
管理區
] [
重新整理
]
預設
夜間
軍武
[
回到版面
]
回應模式
名 稱
內 文
EID OG SMAPS
附加圖檔
[
無貼圖
] [
SAGE
]
可附加圖檔類型:GIF, JPG, JPEG, PNG, WEBM,瀏覽器才能正常附加圖檔
附加圖檔最大上傳資料量為 5120 KB。
當檔案超過寬 125 像素、高 125 像素時會自動縮小尺寸顯示
投稿時請點擊畫像認證後,再按下 [送出] 按鈕提交。
鬧板、攻擊性發言、煽動性發言請無視(回應者也無視),並使用del或在貓管理部向管理員回報。
新介面尚處於測試階段,如果有任何問題可以向管理員或於程設交流版反映。
檔名:
1748444542411.jpg
-(209 KB, 1200x797)
可變翼戰機的派龍
無名
25/05/28(三)23:02:22 ID:xFrm34Zs
No.1241986
del
可以動的部分是不是不能裝派龍架?
可變翼戰機的掛載點是不是因此會比較少?
是的 中华民国会赢 哀 太糟糕了 核武神教廚 中华民国一打來我就投降
25/05/28(三)23:43:25 ID:AoBMtv8A
No.1241991
del
檔名:
1748447005918.jpg
-(97 KB, 540x799)
>>1241986
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panavia_Tornado_ADV#Specifications_
(Tornado_F3)
Hardpoints: 10 total (4 × semi-recessed under-fuselage, 2 × under-wing, 4 × under-wing shoulder rail)
無名
25/05/29(四)14:03:35 ID:kaMXvaiI
No.1242017
del
龍捲風式的可變翼式可以裝掛架的
英國人的技術力真的沒人敢嗆
F-14是餅式機身
所以飛彈可以裝在機身下面
無名
25/05/29(四)15:30:51 ID:ggukTauI
No.1242023
del
檔名:
1748503851973.jpg
-(44 KB, 780x600)
>>1241986
>可以動的部分是不是不能裝派龍架?
對
>可變翼戰機的掛載點是不是因此會比較少?
不花錢加上可旋轉掛架是誰的問題?
是的 中华民国会赢 哀 太糟糕了 核武神教廚 中华民国一打來我就投降
25/05/29(四)23:37:41 ID:nv/cjbis
No.1242063
del
檔名:
1748533061036.jpg
-(84 KB, 545x295)
>>1242023
https://www.airvectors.net/avf111.html
General Dynamics F-111
v1.0.7 / 01 dec 23 / greg goebel
There were four stores hardpoints under each wing, for a total of eight, but four stores pylons were the usual fit in practice; the inner pair of stores pylons adjusted sweep with the wing, the outer pair did not, meaning the wing couldn't be swept in flight if the outer pylons were fitted.
There was also a weapons bay under the fuselage behind the cockpit, another inheritance from Navy involvement, with the weapons bay put to various uses on different F-111 variants.
In the F-111A, it could be used to accommodate an M61 Vulcan 20-millimeter Gatling cannon, with a drum containing more than 2,000 rounds of ammunition.
It could also be used to store twin long-range fuel tanks with a total capacity of 2,214 liters (585 US gallons), though they were rarely used.
【刪除文章】[
僅刪除附加圖檔
]
刪除用密碼: